<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panorama vs. Pano &#8211; iPhone Application Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technosanity.com/2008/11/18/panorama-vs-pano-iphone-application-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technosanity.com/2008/11/18/panorama-vs-pano-iphone-application-review/</link>
	<description>doing different things. expecting different results.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:21:04 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AutoStitch - My New Favorite iPhone Panorama App &#124; TechnoSanity</title>
		<link>http://www.technosanity.com/2008/11/18/panorama-vs-pano-iphone-application-review/comment-page-1/#comment-638</link>
		<dc:creator>AutoStitch - My New Favorite iPhone Panorama App &#124; TechnoSanity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 05:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technosanity.com/?p=210#comment-638</guid>
		<description>[...] in November of 2008, I wrote up a quick review of two iPhone panorama stitching applications - Panorama vs. Pano. Shortly after that review, Panorama changed it&#8217;s interface, but it has remained my panorama [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in November of 2008, I wrote up a quick review of two iPhone panorama stitching applications &#8211; Panorama vs. Pano. Shortly after that review, Panorama changed it&#8217;s interface, but it has remained my panorama [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie Price</title>
		<link>http://www.technosanity.com/2008/11/18/panorama-vs-pano-iphone-application-review/comment-page-1/#comment-575</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technosanity.com/?p=210#comment-575</guid>
		<description>I do see similar ghosting in the tree tops. Was it a windy day? For fewer images the pano looks really good with nice blending and saturation.  Always the more images that you can shoot for a panoramic, the more dynamic the image. This is great for a hand held landscape!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do see similar ghosting in the tree tops. Was it a windy day? For fewer images the pano looks really good with nice blending and saturation.  Always the more images that you can shoot for a panoramic, the more dynamic the image. This is great for a hand held landscape!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon Lefevre</title>
		<link>http://www.technosanity.com/2008/11/18/panorama-vs-pano-iphone-application-review/comment-page-1/#comment-573</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Lefevre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technosanity.com/?p=210#comment-573</guid>
		<description>Yep, the Panorama picture looks alot better!  Cool!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, the Panorama picture looks alot better!  Cool!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
